Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
Nature Plants (2022)
376
13
Metrics details
Underground microbial ecosystems have profound impacts on plant health1,2,3,4,5. Recently, essential roles have been shown for plant specialized metabolites in shaping the rhizosphere microbiome6,7,8,9. However, the potential mechanisms underlying the root-to-soil delivery of these metabolites remain to be elucidated10. Cucurbitacins, the characteristic bitter triterpenoids in cucurbit plants (such as melon and watermelon), are synthesized by operon-like gene clusters11. Here we report two Multidrug and Toxic Compound Extrusion (MATE) proteins involved in the transport of their respective cucurbitacins, a process co-regulated with cucurbitacin biosynthesis. We further show that the transport of cucurbitacin B from the roots of melon into the soil modulates the rhizosphere microbiome by selectively enriching for two bacterial genera, Enterobacter and Bacillus, and we demonstrate that this, in turn, leads to robust resistance against the soil-borne wilt fungal pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum. Our study offers insights into how transporters for specialized metabolites manipulate the rhizosphere microbiota and thereby affect crop fitness.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
111,22 €
only 9,27 € per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.
All data supporting the findings of this study are available in the paper, the extended data and the Supplementary Information. The amplicon sequencing data and shotgun sequencing data were deposited at NCBI under Bioproject No. PRJNA756119 and are publicly accessible at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/all/?term=PRJNA756119. Source data are provided with this paper.
Pieterse, C. M. et al. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 52, 347–375 (2014).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Hacquard, S., Spaepen, S., Garrido-Oter, R. & Schulze-Lefert, P. Interplay between innate immunity and the plant microbiota. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 55, 565–589 (2017).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. & Bakker, P. A. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 478–486 (2012).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Vannier, N., Agler, M. & Hacquard, S. Microbiota-mediated disease resistance in plants. PLoS Pathog. 15, e1007740 (2019).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
de la Fuente Cantó, C. et al. An extended root phenotype: the rhizosphere, its formation and impacts on plant fitness. Plant J. 103, 951–964 (2020).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
Stringlis, I. A. et al. MYB72-dependent coumarin exudation shapes root microbiome assembly to promote plant health. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E5213–E5222 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Hu, L. et al. Root exudate metabolites drive plant–soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota. Nat. Commun. 9, 2738 (2018).
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Huang, A. C. et al. A specialized metabolic network selectively modulates Arabidopsis root microbiota. Science 364, eaau6389 (2019).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Koprivova, A. et al. Root-specific camalexin biosynthesis controls the plant growth-promoting effects of multiple bacterial strains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15735–15744 (2019).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Sasse, J., Martinoia, E. & Northen, T. Feed your friends: do plant exudates shape the root microbiome? Trends Plant Sci. 23, 25–41 (2018).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. Convergence and divergence of bitterness biosynthesis and regulation in Cucurbitaceae. Nat. Plants 2, 16183 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Augustin, J. M., Kuzina, V., Andersen, S. B. & Bak, S. Molecular activities, biosynthesis and evolution of triterpenoid saponins. Phytochemistry 72, 435–457 (2011).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Osbourn, A., Goss, R. J. & Field, R. A. The saponins—polar isoprenoids with important and diverse biological activities. Nat. Prod. Rep. 28, 1261–1268 (2011).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Thimmappa, R., Geisler, K., Louveau, T., O’Maille, P. & Osbourn, A. Triterpene biosynthesis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 225–257 (2014).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Field, B. & Osbourn, A. E. Metabolic diversification—independent assembly of operon-like gene clusters in different plants. Science 320, 543–547 (2008).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Kazachkova, Y. et al. The GORKY glycoalkaloid transporter is indispensable for preventing tomato bitterness. Nat. Plants 7, 468–480 (2021).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Qi, X. et al. A different function for a member of an ancient and highly conserved cytochrome P450 family: from essential sterols to plant defense. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18848–18853 (2006).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Mugford, S. T. et al. A serine carboxypeptidase-like acyltransferase is required for synthesis of antimicrobial compounds and disease resistance in oats. Plant Cell 21, 2473–2484 (2009).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Boisson-Dernier, A. et al. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed roots of Medicago truncatula for the study of nitrogen-fixing and endomycorrhizal symbiotic associations. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 14, 695–700 (2001).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Macias, F. A. et al. Structure–activity relationships (SAR) studies of benzoxazinones, their degradation products and analogues: phytotoxicity on standard target species (STS). J. Agric. Food Chem. 53, 538–548 (2005).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Ongena, M. & Jacques, P. Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 16, 115–125 (2008).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Niu, B., Paulson, J. N., Zheng, X. & Kolter, R. Simplified and representative bacterial community of maize roots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E2450–E2459 (2017).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Baetz, U. & Martinoia, E. Root exudates: the hidden part of plant defense. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 90–98 (2014).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Yoo, S.-D., Cho, Y.-H. & Sheen, J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1565–1572 (2007).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. Single-molecule analysis of PIP2;1 dynamics and partitioning reveals multiple modes of Arabidopsis plasma membrane aquaporin regulation. Plant Cell 23, 3780–3797 (2011).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Chen, H. et al. An ACC oxidase gene essential for cucumber carpel development. Mol. Plant 9, 1315–1327 (2016).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Lincoln, C., Long, J., Yamaguchi, J., Serikawa, K. & Hake, S. A knotted1-like homeobox gene in Arabidopsis is expressed in the vegetative meristem and dramatically alters leaf morphology when overexpressed in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 6, 1859–1876 (1994).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tian, S. et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based gene knockout in watermelon. Plant Cell Rep. 36, 399–406 (2017).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Pak, H.-K. et al. Hairy root induction in Oriental melon (Cucumis melo) by Agrobacterium rhizogenes and reproduction of the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 98, 219–228 (2009).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Kajikawa, M., Morikawa, K., Abe, Y., Yokota, A. & Akashi, K. Establishment of a transgenic hairy root system in wild and domesticated watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) for studying root vigor under drought. Plant Cell Rep. 29, 771–778 (2010).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Zhou, X. & Wu, F. p-Coumaric acid influenced cucumber rhizosphere soil microbial communities and the growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum Owen. PLoS ONE 7, e48288 (2012).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Wickham, H. Getting Started with ggplot2. In: ggplot2. Use R!. (Springer, Cham, 2016).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Garcia-Mas, J. et al. The genome of melon (Cucumis melo L.). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11872–11877 (2012).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Menzel, P., Ng, K. L. & Krogh, A. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju. Nat. Commun. 7, 11257 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Klein, M. et al. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter Bpt1p mediates vacuolar sequestration of glutathione conjugates in yeast. FEBS Lett. 520, 63–67 (2002).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Yamanaka, N., Marqués, G. & O’Connor, M. B. Vesicle-mediated steroid hormone secretion in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 163, 907–919 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Zhao, J. & Dixon, R. A. MATE transporters facilitate vacuolar uptake of epicatechin 3′-O-glucoside for proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 2323–2340 (2009).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 676–684 (2019).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Xu, Z. et al. Contribution of bacillomycin D in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 to antifungal activity and biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 808–815 (2013).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Download references
We thank Q. R. Shen (Nanjing Agricultural University), H. S. Wang and S. L. Wang (Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, CAAS) for providing experimental assistance. This work was supported by the Yunnan provincial, Shenzhen municipal and Dapeng district governments. This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2018YFA0901800 to Y.S.), the Yunnan Science Fund (grant no. 202105AF150028, 202005AE160015 and 2019FJ004 to Y.S.), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (grant no. KQTD2016113010482651 to S.H.), the Special Funds for Science Technology Innovation and Industrial Development of Shenzhen Dapeng New District (grant no. RC201901-05 to S.H.), the BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Grant ‘Molecules from Nature–Products and Pathways’ (grant no. BBS/E/J/000PR9790 to A.O.) and the John Innes Foundation.
These authors contributed equally: Yang Zhong, Weibing Xun, Xiaohan Wang.
Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
Yang Zhong, Dawei Li, Xu Cheng, William J. Lucas, Sanwen Huang & Yongshuo Ma
State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China
Yang Zhong & Yaoguang Liu
Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of the Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch Joint Laboratory of Horticultural Genomics, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
Yang Zhong & Yuxuan Qin
Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid Organic Wastes, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
Weibing Xun
College of Life Science, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
Xiaohan Wang & Legong Li
National Watermelon and Melon Improvement Center, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (North China), Beijing Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Improvement, Beijing, China
Shouwei Tian
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
Yancong Zhang
Hubei Key Laboratory of Natural Medicinal Chemistry and Resource Evaluation, School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Yuan Zhou
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Potato Biology, CAAS-YNNU-YINMORE Joint Academy of Potato Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China
Bo Zhang & Yi Shang
Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China
Guangwei Zhao
Hunan Vegetable Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha, China
Huiming Chen
John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
Anne Osbourn
Department of Plant Biology, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
William J. Lucas
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
Yongshuo Ma
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Y.S. and Y.M. conceived and designed the project. Y.M., Y. Zhong, X.W., S.T., D.L., Y. Zhou, Y.Q., B.Z., G.Z., X.C. and H.C. performed the experiments. W.X. and Y. Zhang performed the bioinformatics analysis on the microbiota sequencing results. Y.M., W.X., X.W., Y. Zhong and Y.S. analysed the data. Y.M., W.X., Y.L., L.L., A.O., W.J.L., Y.S. and S.H. wrote the paper.
Correspondence to Yongshuo Ma or Yi Shang.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Nature Plants thanks Reuben Peters and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
For melon, gene expression is presented by FPKM value of the candidates; for watermelon, gene expression was measured by qRT-PCR assay. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 3, biological independent samples). Relative gene expression level is shown with the same scale. Potential bitterness transporters are indicated in bold font.
Source data
a and d, Yeast one-hybrid analysis of the interaction between the melon bitterness regulator, CmBl or CmBt, and the promoter of CmMATE1 (a), and the interaction between watermelon bitterness regulator, ClBl or ClBt, and the promoter of ClMATE1 (d). P, promoter; AD, activation domain; 3-AT, 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole; SD-L-T, synthetic dropout media W/O leucine and tryptophan; SD-L-T-H, synthetic dropout media W/O leucine, tryptophan, and histidine. b and e, CmBl or CmBt, binds to the promoter region of CmMATE1 (b) and activates a higher luciferase activity relative to the control (empty vector) in N. benthamiana leaves. Similar result was also observed for ClBl or ClBt, and ClMATE1 (e). LUC, luciferase. Renilla LUC was used as reference. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 3, biological independent experiments). Statistical differences were analysed using two-sided Student’s t-test. ** P < 0.01. *** P < 0.001. c and f, EMSA shows that CmBl or CmBt was recruited to the promoter of CmMATE1 (c). Similar result was also observed for ClBl and ClMATE1, or ClBt and ClMATE1 (f). Promoter region from -2,000 upstream from the start codon is schematically presented. Black vertical lines indicate the location of an E-box and red horizontal lines indicate the region amplified for EMSA. Comp, competitor (unlabeled probe); His, His tag; +/-, presence/absence of protein or competitor; closed triangle, increasing amount of protein or competitor.
Source data
a, Subcellular localization of the two MATEs in cucumber protoplasts. CmMATE1-GFP or ClMATE1-GFP fluorescence is co-localized with a known Arabidopsis plasma membrane marker PIP2A-RFP fluorescence. From left to right: GFP signal (green), RFP signal (red), Differential Interference Contrast (DIC), and overlay of three signals (green, red and DIC) of the same protoplast. b and c, In situ localization of CmBi (b) or ClBi (c) transcripts in the outer region of young root tips in melon and watermelon, respectively. Both transverse (above the broken line) and longitudinal (below the broken line) sections of the root tip are presented. d, Subcellular localization of CmMATE1-GFP or ClMATE1-GFP fusion protein in yeast. All MATE-GFP fusion proteins were localized to the yeast tonoplast. From left to right: GFP fluorescence (green), FM4-64 staining of the vacuolar membrane (red), Differential Interference Contrast (DIC), merged images with GFP, FM4-64 and DIC from the same sample. For a to d, Three independent experiments were repeated with similar results.
a, CuB level accumulated in the rhizosphere of soils planted with Cm104 or Cm70 treated with different levels of CuB solution. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). DW, dry weight of soil; ND, not detected. b and c, The growth of Cm70 and Cm104 was normal when planted in pots containing the steriled conducive soil after 8 days (b). However, in the non-sterile conducive soil, most of the Cm70 seedlings exhibited wilting symptoms and eventually died, whereas most Cm104 seedlings grew normally (c). Cm104, the melon with a bitter root; Cm70, the melon line with a non-bitter root. d, Progress of wilt disease on the Cm70 plants treated with CuC or CuE. Data are represented as mean ± SD for three independent experiments (n = 48 in total for each treatment). e, The growth of ClMATE1-edited and its wild-type (WT) watermelon plants was normal when planted on the same non-sterile conducive soil, after 8 days. For b, c, e, Three independent experiments were repeated with similar results.
Source data
a and b, The bacterial (a) and fungal (b) diversity index of the soil, rhizosphere and endosphere communities of healthy and diseased seedlings (means ± SD, n = 3). The bacterial Shannon diversity was significantly lower in the healthy lines than the diseased lines, in the rhizosphere, but not in the endosphere communities, whereas the fungal Shannon diversity showed no significant changes between the two groups, regardless of rhizosphere or endosphere. Statistical differences were analysed using two-sided Student’s t-test. ***, significant difference (P < 0.001). n.s., Not significant.
Source data
The three genera were selected as indicators correlating to plant disease susceptibility, and their significance was detected by the Mantel test.
The grey area along the solid lines shows the 95% confidence bands of the linear regression.
Unpaired two-tail Student’s T-test was used to detect the difference of the relative abundance of species in the rhizosphere between group levels. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. ns: not significant. The box plots show the first and third quartiles (boxes) and the median (middle line); whiskers show inner fences (that is 1.5 times the interquartile range below the first quartile and above the third quartile); points in the boxes show the mean values.
Source data
Note that growth of the Bacillus strains could be significantly inhibited in TSB medium supplemented with 150 ppm CuB, whereas CuB had little effect on the growth of the Enterobacter strains E-126 and E-128. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 6 for a and n = 8 for b).
Source data
a, The profiles of CuB content in TSB medium after 3 days of culture with the indicated Enterobacter strains. A significant decrease in CuB level was observed in the medium cultured with Enterobacter strains, compared to that of TSB medium without Enterobacter strain (CK). Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). b and c, HPLC-QTOF-MS analysis of the E-159 medium supplemented with CuB. b, Metabolic profiling analysis of extracts prepared from E-159 medium. The medium supplemented with only CuB (CuB + medium) or without CuB but containing E-159 strain (E-159 + medium) was considered as negative control. CuB was dissolved in methanol, and equal-volume methanol was added for each treatment. Two specific peaks (indicated by CuB derivate), at retention time of 2.64 and 2.72 min, respectively, were detected in the E-159 medium supplemented with CuB. TIC, total ion chromatograms; EIC 558.3421, extracted a characteristic fragmental ion of the CuB derivates at m/z of 558.3421. c, Comparison of the mass spectrum between CuB derivates and CuB standard. Although the mass spectra of CuB derivates and CuB shared the same quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 576, the ion signal in CuB derivates were deciphered as a hydron plus CuB derivate ([M + H]+), while the ion signal in CuB it was suggested to be an ammonium cation plus CuB ([M + NH4]+).
Source data
Supplementary Figs. 1–6.
Supplementary Tables 1–3.
Statistical source data.
Statistical source data.
Statistical source data.
Statistical source data.
Statistical source data.
Unprocessed EMSA.
Statistical source data.
Statistical source data.
Statistical source data.
Statistical source data.
Statistical source data.
Reprints and Permissions
Zhong, Y., Xun, W., Wang, X. et al. Root-secreted bitter triterpene modulates the rhizosphere microbiota to improve plant fitness. Nat. Plants (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01201-2
Download citation
Received: 16 July 2021
Accepted: 22 June 2022
Published: 01 August 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01201-2
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Advertisement
Advanced search
© 2022 Springer Nature Limited
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.